From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Compiled files without sources???? Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:10:41 +0200 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87oc0847bi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87ei1bzjwg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4E3133CE.7010101@cs.ucla.edu> <4E31F0B3.3030505@cs.ucla.edu> <87mxfw90oo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r558ms8j.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zkjv33w3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87sjpn8if0.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87sjpm7lvt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <878vrepc6g.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87mxfunx4h.fsf@gnus.org> <877h6yp652.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <874o21pazd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312269066 26548 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2011 07:11:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 07:11:06 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 09:11:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo982-0006sw-Oi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:11:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo981-0000d2-VR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 03:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo97z-0000cm-FN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 03:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo97y-00074T-HG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 03:10:59 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:45373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo97y-00074P-Aq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 03:10:58 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo97v-0006qh-9I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:10:55 +0200 Original-Received: from p508edf02.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.142.223.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:10:55 +0200 Original-Received: from dak by p508edf02.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:10:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508edf02.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jZRufpaxXIbw5I+1dA7c/75VLSQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142677 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > I don't think that we violated the assignment contract. We do release > the source files (the grammar files), which is what the contract > requires. Who is "we"? CEDET is not a GNU project. It is hosted on SourceForge. It is not nor has ever been released by the FSF short of the parts distributed with Emacs, and is not to be found on GNU servers otherwise. > Our error was to release them in a different package, and not in the > same package with the non-source form of the same code. Could you give a pointer to that package? -- David Kastrup