From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:27:30 -0400 Message-ID: <87obyf44kd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87fwjsqs9l.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316534896 12120 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2011 16:08:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 18:08:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R62rk-0000ga-9A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:08:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36919 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R62rj-0001qn-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R62ER-000757-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R62EN-0005W0-B1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:27:35 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]:43236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R62EN-0005Vq-7y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp-128-36-14-81.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8KFRUeO002136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:27:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:13:33 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144122 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > After Martin relentlessly and carefully worked out the bugs from his > humongous, many-faceted, and detailed buffer-display changes, you > suddenly changed it all again (recently). And during a feature > freeze, no less. Even Martin (our resident window/buffer-display > expert) has admitted that he does not yet understand the new code. > > Does that count as "something coming up"? No.