At Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:18:00 +0100,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de> writes:
>
> > I don't see why we should drop the link type in fuzzy links. After all
> > they /are/ are special type of link.
>
> There is no link type in fuzzy links : [[something]] matches
> <<something>> in master.
>
> > Without the link type we will run into trouble, won't we?.
> >
> > In the example file:
> >
> > ,----
> > | We end the list at item [[itm:last]].
> > `----
> >
> > So, itm:last is a fuzzy link but it could as well be a "regular" link
> > of type "itm" with a path component of "last" and no description.
>
> I realize my examples are confusing. I shouldn't have used colons. In
> fact, the output will be the same if the target is <<itm-last>>,
> <<table-last>> or even <<foo>>.
>
> In other words, the "itm:" part wasn't meant as a link type, but as
> a cosmetic part of the name. So the list example could as well be:

Thanks for the clarification.

Best,
  -- David
--
OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6
Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org
Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de