From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12858: 24.3.50; Critical: advice broken Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:18:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87obj4t5wp.fsf@web.de> References: <87zk2pq695.fsf@drachen.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352654330 19889 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2012 17:18:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12858@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 11 18:19:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TXbBU-0004ea-9d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:19:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39355 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXbBK-00015R-Rg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:18:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58225) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXbBG-00015L-HY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:18:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXbBD-0003b5-Fl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:18:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXbBD-0003aw-CV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:18:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXbBW-00055c-Eg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12858 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12858-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12858.135265430419518 (code B ref 12858); Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12858) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2012 17:18:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33416 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXbAu-00054l-4k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:18:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:54170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXbAq-00054c-2E for 12858@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:18:21 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.130.115]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGzXS-1TbT2C1OK2-00DOj2; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:17:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:27:13 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:qkdZo6pX5Q+aOHsND0W/QXkX8UMdxkfb9+lNHQTQhF4 7zXND4Tt8Erzu/w5Vgmr4Uhdk/XfZvAOBOA9yHuJhBBonTwsVd nphIRj1mWWvQIR37NHCQTwvB44uzOmgTWDxYc6bql1EQo+mnPP qiNIjd/RFTXXSe9ue5lLX6eGHr4ywrbXN3Yi5tvvePv7xLNw/l tOT4ApgoPyglf4YprORKO0clvvbhUV1QKDulYLArBY= X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66767 Archived-At: Hello Stefan, > I haven't had time to look at your bug report(s) yet, but I recommend > you follow the `emacs-24' branch now that we've moved the pretest > code there. > This will help us fix bugs before the 24.3 release. > Also this will save you from the bugs on the trunk, since the trunk is > now less stable. Stability isn't critical for me, as I don't need Emacs for my job or such. Although this was a bad surprise last night. Question: If we neglect stability - is it more helpful for Emacs dev when I use the emacs-24 branch and "search" bugs there? Or did you mean that it would be mainly better for me? Regards, Michael.