From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Incorrect result of org-babel-edit-distance
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:43:39 -0700
Message-ID: <87obi53avk.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <877govfajj.fsf@yahoo.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45427)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Th3qd-00085M-Sv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:44:40 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Th3qc-00077h-Ds
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:44:35 -0500
Received: from mail-ia0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:62933)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Th3qc-00077d-AP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:44:34 -0500
Received: by mail-ia0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r4so1452108iaj.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 11:44:33 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Richard <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Nicolas Richard" <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> (org-babel-edit-distance "foo" "ffoo") returns 0, whereas 1 seems
> appropriate. I don't know much about computing the levenshtein distance,
> but it seems that part of the algorithm (which i found explained on
> fr.wikipedia) is missing from the code. Please find a patch below trying
> to address the issue.
>

Applied. Thanks!,

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte