From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Timer scheduling and cancel-timer Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:32:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87obgg2qjb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20130121005802.c7383f4994ead287e738f96f@cx4a.org> <50FC43DB.6070505@cs.ucla.edu> <0C917BD4690341A181CF2BE23E754FC7@us.oracle.com> <87ham9v4lt.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <87a9s1us05.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <87y5fltd12.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358934024 5802 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2013 09:40:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Tomohiro Matsuyama' , 'Paul Eggert' , 'Stefan Monnier' , Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 23 10:40:42 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Txwoy-0003uk-Pn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:40:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40929 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Txwoh-0005nr-KC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:40:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Txwoe-0005mp-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:40:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Txwoc-0001Pa-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:40:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]:39842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Txwoc-0001PL-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ds1so2391270wgb.4 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:40:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=WgLduZlEkXHFTEVfv3kUljG86vBUN6lsuOKX1Men5XM=; b=cAXLyZ0gH06Pwe8qMp8a6dvYgOwzfMWJGX9+k20ISOPoSmeE50cxx+InnLj/wQBVwR kiYBrNXJ41w7LQB+i7UZWOnrOFUSVAUOoDmRXl8p13Qddwv+f3GrqPuJGVUhdPnCT1iK h1dZwEcPvjHMWj89j/zPU7UHblX0uvY0VRnSorqBfAnCRiblAKEXWJWT3hkcX0OyqCwG XwO7XRWOP7yt30GvDC5lnyqK5h/lH87ZP48eOYfbkpd4KcgLYz6y0hiRWNVXMcdfYuid MHTbSrSjR5ELuoSanW8ol5wSXAuGzVT4OQmh/lj4pM/R2bXWyuow7ncDMcCXsSEEzSpK +7BA== X-Received: by 10.194.78.236 with SMTP id e12mr1120301wjx.32.1358933546645; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:32:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm25904172wif.11.2013.01.23.01.32.24 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:32:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B48971C21017; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:32:24 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87y5fltd12.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:09:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156597 Archived-At: Bastien writes: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> I just hit the bug again, and now realized it happens when point follows >> an *unbalanced* right paren. So I tried your patch, and indeed it fixes >> the bug. Thanks. > > Thanks for confirming, I applied the patch in trunk. Well, I thought I did, but I didn't. My trunk directory was not bound to the remote branch anymore after I did a fresh rsync (as suggested in this page: http://savannah.gnu.org/bzr/?group=emacs) I'll apply the patch again and make sure this goes into trunk *for real* this time. (As Alan would say, and because it feels good to say it again, bzr is really a pain in the association list...) -- Bastien