Teemu Likonen [2011-03-07 20:19:13 +02:00] wrote:

> I think it would be better if "C-x TAB" (bound to indent-rigidly)
> advanced the indentation to the next tab stop (as in tab-stop-list) by
> default, instead of by 1. Similarly, if negative prefix argument were
> given (with "C-u -") it would change the indentation to the previous
> tab stop. Only when the prefix argument is actual number, positive or
> negative integer, it would move the indentation to the left or right
> by the given count.

Any opinions on this? If you want to use the code in my first message
just go on. The copyright assignment paperwork is done.