From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13594: Planning Emacs-24.4 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:55:21 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87ob5fj31q.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <5289F003.5040708@gmx.at> <528A13DA.1030309@gmx.at> <528B1652.2050604@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384909815 28266 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2013 01:10:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13594@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Liu To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 02:10:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ViwJ9-0007tw-Dn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:10:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52325 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViwJ8-0005Wt-Pb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:10:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViwIz-0005Ud-BH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:10:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViwIt-0007Cd-7g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:10:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47999) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViwIt-0007CI-4E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ViwIs-0004bQ-Eo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 13594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13594.138490974317583 (code B ref 13594); Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2013 01:09:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ViwHv-0004ZW-Cs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:09:03 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:44937 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ViwHt-0004Z7-2u for 13594@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost.jurta.org (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99EF258B9E936; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:08:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <528B1652.2050604@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:42:10 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80772 Archived-At: > It would have just meant that a function like `display-buffer-no-window' > would have to return 'fail in order to confirm that it is aware of the > semantics of a thing like no-display-ok. Do you think `display-buffer-no-window' should return 'fail instead of t when the user overrides the default action? Then it could be defined as: (defun display-buffer-no-window (buffer alist) (when (cdr (assq 'allow-no-window alist)) 'fail)) And the user customization: (add-to-list 'display-buffer-alist '("\\*compilation\\*" display-buffer-no-window (nil)))