From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12000: 24.1.50; do not hard-code `bold' font for help output Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:39:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87ob2epmgb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <7D9DB8E6B2CC4312BF6186379903A282@us.oracle.com> <874n49hsgj.fsf@building.gnus.org> <874n46r2bv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392075670 29267 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 23:41:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 12000@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 11 00:41:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WD0TW-00074H-3p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:41:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58740 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WD0TV-0006lj-Od for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WD0TM-0006W8-3G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:41:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WD0TG-0003IN-VJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WD0TG-0003IJ-OD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WD0TG-0001ZW-9W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Bastien Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12000 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 12000-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12000.13920756225976 (code B ref 12000); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12000) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 23:40:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WD0Sb-0001YK-Qj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:40:22 -0500 Original-Received: from rs249.mailgun.us ([209.61.151.249]:56631) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WD0SY-0001Y3-VB for 12000@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:40:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kickhub.com; q=dns/txt; s=mailo; t=1392075613; h=From: To: Cc: Subject: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Message-Id: Mime-Version: Content-Type: Sender; bh=m6wqBOQVq3iVfhUZkSWvqZx3zBFadkPuxa6RNVo/udI=; b=r7D+oIEnlxkhYQc3g2ZSrUKfZDtUb2wXuBGiv1lWm9i1pjuu4C86xYXq+P71vHPy2aIpqxOe O+IVK1MOpkHbBlwf48gnxylvOE54d6ubZtcOK7fWw3GpeXFxNF8BPSYZa3kavFpYtUJyWZoJ yITI/Dq330dJSrKi1M+PgNKX6kM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=kickhub.com; s=mailo; q=dns; h=From: To: Cc: Subject: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Message-Id: Mime-Version: Content-Type: Sender; b=Y+HeFe5Ww12tf5C3tpKPPbSXHpnO4bF6ifDd7U0YoJoD8VVVEGnSj0+/0LkgZ7wDV+esk6 ihc54uSn9/dJ5Rmn1OBYPUDgvarxGk00s2r1WfkUEJdxYgyVKGhmMerjUs/y44CHMiCEeVxi 2EmWalmev3d/xgjNA3RqFNHJZdOpw= Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net [81.56.68.112]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 52f96317.5878030-in1; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:39:03 -0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 664EC1C20648; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:39:00 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:32:50 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Mailgun-Sid: WyIzM2Q0MCIsICIxMjAwMEBkZWJidWdzLmdudS5vcmciLCAiMTY0ODgiXQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85339 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> > No. The bug, as stated in the subject line and the bug report, >> > is hard-coding `bold'. >> >> I'd consider this a design choice, not a bug. > > If it's by design then it is a design bug. There is no need > to hard-code things like this. Hard-coding takes power and > freedom away from Emacs users. It just puts obstacles in their > way. And typically, like here, gratuitously, with no gain. Please fill this as a feature request. While people are fixing bugs before a release, such bug reports are a distraction. -- Bastien