From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16784: 24.3; Problems opening NNTP connection: failing starttls because of a non-verified certificate Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:43:00 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87ob24ctq3.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <86bny5r5lj.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392738191 9580 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2014 15:43:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16784@debbugs.gnu.org To: sb@dod.no Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 18 16:43:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmpK-0001Ow-N1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:43:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50250 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmpK-00027a-4r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:43:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmpB-00025r-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:43:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmp6-00050f-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:43:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmp6-00050a-9S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmp4-0003H9-Of; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:43:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16784 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16784-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16784.139273817412577 (code B ref 16784); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16784) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2014 15:42:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58590 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmov-0003Gm-Mq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:42:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f50.google.com ([209.85.192.50]:48936) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFmoq-0003GQ-LM for 16784@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:42:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id z60so7161883qgd.9 for <16784@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 07:42:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=Gf4bNG6KuEivnTpCaz7GJystzW+DynztSdLis2qssng=; b=DZydScX7vxMXoPKrpEolw5CC5Alm4CuPUSFRGJ9NBhVby9I0K91podPos1K78V6zgI NZJjCgjOdG1z4J6H4zEOfHQDpcCH2eH2mI/tTCL9scuHtopOTpbMVoAr516Muy/E/DXb 7L7i7/wvPbwjVdySyTmB/vAGXOY3rcimM2yd0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=Gf4bNG6KuEivnTpCaz7GJystzW+DynztSdLis2qssng=; b=IrXHA6c8mVl5UzME5odg7RWdjehTSMKdMBmZzHI7YUHhLYLfyRzDrcRffA8m45FoYW Bpfn7busSwSbxc+HfnYGAeJ7SXHU8KEsD5cxi4tbPPrZo5ZhJzbNRVJgOpgVdStBZJNk tzAHyf9aRclv/C6X8/893CiNfXLA5jyCvj/VQS2vhdS5FoUYxfLY2Jo9kfnkfiX8RwLp DgsZorPEhUPf2peGhJTi+ZF/wQ474l2QhplXwcPL3QqvXAZ1oWyqBcduhms73kMPOtMk 9tEafpRYZy3YhbQKqXHSHH76gQNTEtpeKtAdenNChjEmSGV6o1t4PjOaNtLQxaX2BVf6 d/TA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQleYH6lb3xcMhmG/vHAOVkJMfzWG+IjN0i3U7ZrmeMkvAD3vop16Vhaj4Kq/KEH4/o/pXp4 X-Received: by 10.140.98.203 with SMTP id o69mr2746322qge.102.1392738163019; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 07:42:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from flea (c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.229.61.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y19sm15903498qae.20.2014.02.18.07.42.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 07:42:41 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <86bny5r5lj.fsf@dod.no> (sb@dod.no's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:50:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85821 Archived-At: On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:50:32 +0100 sb@dod.no wrote: s> Entering news.gmane.no nntp groups in gnus fails on Windows, because it s> tries to upgrade the connection using STARTTLS and fails because the s> news.gmane.org certificate is self signed. Steinar also posted some suggestions in the original thread: SB> I would like one of the following solutions: SB> 1. The possibility to switch off the attempted upgrade to STARTTLS for SB> NNTP connections SB> 2. The possibility to tell GNU-TLS not to be so stringent about SB> certificate verification I'll respond as soon as I'm able :) Ted