From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Titus von der Malsburg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18722: Correction Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:55:14 -0700 Message-ID: <87oatc57rx.fsf@posteo.de> References: <874mv6jt7g.fsf@gmail.com> <878ukhko3u.fsf@posteo.de> <543F8747.7020804@gmx.at> <83fveo49fb.fsf@gnu.org> <87tx345ay2.fsf@posteo.de> <83wq802hfz.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3y859ua.fsf@posteo.de> <83siio2fl7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413474983 17487 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2014 15:56:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18722@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 16 17:56:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XenPS-0005Fl-8B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:56:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50983 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XenPR-0007WK-Pm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:56:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XenPL-0007WC-1N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:56:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XenPG-0002KO-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XenPG-0002KK-RH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XenPG-00024x-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Titus von der Malsburg Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18722 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18722-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18722.14134749277928 (code B ref 18722); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18722) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2014 15:55:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46141 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XenOg-00023n-EY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:55:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mx02.posteo.de ([89.146.194.165]:37834) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XenOd-00023f-Vp for 18722@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AAB1D1B2E3; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:55:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at posteo.de Original-Received: from posteo.de ([10.125.125.178]) (using TLS) by localhost (amavis1.posteo.de [10.125.125.165]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTPS id FFydqWlEkj6Z; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:55:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA0FF2C010B; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:55:16 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <83siio2fl7.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94634 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-10-16 Thu 08:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Titus von der Malsburg >> Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 18722@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:10:37 -0700 >>=20 >> I can enter text and save the buffer before clicking menu items. When I >> inspect the content of the file with another editor, I see that it >> contains the text that I entered before saving. > > Do you see the changes in the file before or after you click on the > Emacs frame? If before, then indeed it sounds like Emacs is reacting > to your inputs, but the display is not refreshed. Of course I checked the file before clicking on a menu items, otherwise the test would not be informative. > But a situation where Emacs acts on your input, but does not update > the display is inconceivable, unless some external factor is at work. > That's because the same loop where Emacs reads input also calls > redisplay, and since saving a buffer displays a message in the echo > area, calling redisplay must have updated at least the echo area. I > cannot understand how could Emacs save a buffer, but not display the > echo area message that is part of saving that buffer. I don't know enough about the inner workings of Emacs to say anything useful about this but one possibility might be that there is a bug in GTK that is triggered by recent versions of Emacs but not by earlier versions. >> Given on how rarely I update to the latest development version of Emacs, >> I can't say anything more precise than that the problem was introduced >> during this summer. I know, not very helpful. > > Do you still have the previous binary you built? Can you run it now > and make sure the problem does not exist in that binary? Unfortunately, I don't have this binary anymore. >> What do you mean with bisect? Checkout earlier versions and test them >> until I find the bad commit? Given the high volume of commits in Emacs >> this would take quite a while even when using an efficient >> search strategy. > > Both bzr and git have a bisect command that will converge on the > offending revision logarithmically. Since there were about 1000 > commits since the beginning of the summer, you will need about 10 > different builds. Ok, I'll see what I can do. Titus --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUP+piAAoJEK40WfPGE2idZSMIAMLKsf4ugpuU6VwZklMQDijE ppxfm/qwkmNB5o+HRwxpeI7w3DcjS0+q+swX45QqxKyI/7SCxa7A7WMjYP/I0yai +xdG28g6eTm0fXGY//QhPXqrahTNG6Aw5ghIGsGGd+EQrPpn8nkfTIbmAHNwy7GA suZcFUVJLzsGVFhH25VHAfs9+rFDKXD+UZPQxc+WSQxwlQIhGRqxfmsRKKGG5p9E vXXobK5ew5Kz7OGKBnt6rw0W2J/nHqT+SpfXep2niMOhC23x6v/G3VKFmHfIG3tn ld9yEWNSJkKaAPSTKGIk82H/1dukT+g0iHjg5SHobCo998N+0Ku+m3AYE68Icb0= =o1tL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--