From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why does mml-attach-file put the attachment at the very end of the message... Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:08:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87oafmkndn.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <87r3kikp5t.fsf@mbork.pl> <878u6q9fnv.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445850614 6509 80.91.229.3 (26 Oct 2015 09:10:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Alexis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 26 10:10:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqdmx-0003Xa-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:10:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51278 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqdmx-0005Ks-5T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:09:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqdmf-0005Hn-5t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqdmb-00018W-4L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:09:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:36830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqdma-00018O-U9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:09:37 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD0C6F2007; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:09:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F4dJmM8Wyrtw; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:08:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (103-115.echostar.pl [213.156.103.115]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB25C6F2003; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:08:53 +0100 (CET) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 25.0.50.1 In-reply-to: <878u6q9fnv.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192640 Archived-At: On 2015-10-26, at 09:51, Alexis wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> ...instead of right before the sigdashes? >> >> If there is no particular reason, I propose a patch below. My >> use case is a function that cycles through a few possible >> signatures, where at one point I delete everything after the >> sigdashes. > > i never use sigdashes in emails, and prefer any attachments to be > the very last thing in the email, i.e. after my sig. And in your case the proposed patch would just do it since you don't use sigdashes, `search-backwards' would not move the point. > Alexis. Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University