From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Are there non-mingw32 binaries for Windows? Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:36:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87oa1d99vu.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <5c2aca208090e22a5029d348fe2206bb.squirrel@cloud103.planethippo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479411408 21384 195.159.176.226 (17 Nov 2016 19:36:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:36:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Phillip Lord To: Kevin Layer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 17 20:36:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c7SU2-0003fB-9k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:36:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32893 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7SU5-0005sJ-Og for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:36:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7STz-0005sC-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:36:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7STw-0000yO-Em for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:36:27 -0500 Original-Received: from relaycp02.dominioabsoluto.net ([217.116.26.74]:58734) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7STw-0000xt-81 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:36:24 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.movistar.es (unknown [86.109.99.146]) by relaycp02.dominioabsoluto.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F054D3702; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:36:22 +0100 (CET) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0202.582E06B6.007A, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Original-Received: from qcore (83.35.188.160) by smtp.movistar.es (8.6.122.03) (authenticated as 981711563$telefonica.net) id 57A446BD05693AE5; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:36:18 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Layer's message of "Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:54:55 -0800") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 217.116.26.74 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209455 Archived-At: Kevin Layer writes: [snip] > One question about the mingw32 emacs binary: is it like the Cygwin > emacs binary where it uses Cygwin mounts? What I liked about the > native (MSVC) compiled emacs was that it used C:\... instead of /c/... It seems that you are not informed about what MinGW is. The MinGW build is as native as the MSVC one. It has nothing to do with Cygwin.