From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25511: 26.0.50; modify-frame-parameters modifies undesignated parameter? Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:00:15 -0400 Message-ID: <87o9u2x9ww.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <5885B8D7.4040301@gmx.at> <5885DABE.9000408@gmx.at> <58870656.2090402@gmx.at> <58872061.1050900@gmx.at> <87zidmy4ly.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <59355E51.8090804@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496707162 351 195.159.176.226 (5 Jun 2017 23:59:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 23:59:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25511@debbugs.gnu.org, Katsumi Yamaoka To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 06 01:59:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI1u1-0008Fg-A0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 01:59:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35609 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI1u3-0004qY-6h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:59:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI1tr-0004p8-CL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:59:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI1tm-0005Rj-Jv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dI1tm-0005RX-FU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI1tm-0004go-1k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 23:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25511-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25511.149670712618003 (code B ref 25511); Mon, 05 Jun 2017 23:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2017 23:58:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58279 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI1tW-0004gI-7L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:34646) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dI1tU-0004g5-L0 for 25511@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:58:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id d68so24829132ita.1 for <25511@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 16:58:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=w6bX9klpXUMf7e5MJ+9gV2iT9wudhRfjQA5bujUneIM=; b=Oo/Xe77ZxmI6LZ0FXOh49CAAkLyjkVPS1+wyfq2llQPyLHDFJSEsQbzr4NbRXOA0x4 ZVFlf4dG3HOIOyFuecTxbmBDhI7fT8n8V1m+giqvkLrEXYDKRAkAfnhTaFMvTwqcelB8 daLSxTA+Hnbv2UnKpvAyN+LC8y1jraISsz9JgT7AEwB6KCqEpwUuWY9Hoi+OA6K/yw3D weSjqHqPuEP1+XjZnxWNEI8oAqvikvNMLVL09e979TEZZiGFft7yklp2/RuAiOVZ6ZS0 inCiKLcgtydYDfH0ur9QirZmJr7La/oKb7MtBUbzy2SSU7A4JSGYf/VzRBsxXdM+ttQR MqJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=w6bX9klpXUMf7e5MJ+9gV2iT9wudhRfjQA5bujUneIM=; b=Xug+krgLecCn2XcuLS1MKWbk0/yCMWZy6HlSmEQGLWLp2kXyZB++lUjH7r6v/pbyg+ 8ey95gm1B1YJDVDmVmp4JGxUZMFue8/EBEDXIOGtCEcMdoF0rHG/hlUQyKIGUvXxiDv4 cQ1tB6o1kPOqHbi6qDyh+9u6wHFPTkz7hbfVZQ5INTBeyyGiKR2idmqQckjAYS/NTybd iSEnXNx4kkx90riUUbOTkTcUzwWmGSDkUq2f0ny3Ou/y8eoHcdXGx8lmHxnU/qAkBOQO 0vryEcH9yKHS+ef5nDK3q1A+BdDxzXvyZLwGiLr8Dvzrhf60Fozu1CulnwQjzQZ7wLPO F0Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcA+cFjQNX+sjH4WshPv2wIUqNvJCOyQaTOqoVoSkwu13EhYZrzW 40vScDIoOUVBKA== X-Received: by 10.36.54.195 with SMTP id l186mr8506446itl.55.1496707119172; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 16:58:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm4964401ioz.44.2017.06.05.16.58.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Jun 2017 16:58:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <59355E51.8090804@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 05 Jun 2017 15:36:17 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133331 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Is there something more to do with this bug? > > Is there something more to do with bug#25521? Just the question of whether we should add back some delay after frame creation, the original problem there is easily fixed by changing the user code. I gather from your question that it's the same for this bug?