From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Just sharing another orgmode use: usability tests
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 14:37:54 +0100
Message-ID: <87o9tmenv1.fsf@t3610>
References: <8d18331fde644aa79d32d60d720a8d10@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
	<87h8zg49vk.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>
	<e24c85840a894ce9bbe7c0b56cfc1d53@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Reply-To: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47932)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1dMDvP-00027c-Mv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 09:38:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1dMDvL-0006re-NM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 09:38:03 -0400
Received: from mail-he1eur01on0124.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([104.47.0.124]:13568
	helo=EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1dMDvL-0006r6-9r
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 09:37:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <e24c85840a894ce9bbe7c0b56cfc1d53@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
	(Eduardo Mercovich's message of "Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:19:29 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

On Friday, 16 Jun 2017 at 14:19, Eduardo Mercovich wrote:

[...]

> The standard clocking task mechanism will do it fine.

Great.

> However, since there are many multiple small observations along 
> one task, maybe a capture template is a bit overdo... 

I find that capturing is a lightweight activity.  It all depends on what
you expect to have to do.  For instance, I log some activities by simply
typing "C-c c l COUPLE OF KEYWORDS C-c C-c" and I'm done!  The entry is
time stamped automatically and it simply allows me to note something
without really intruding into a workflow.

But, YMMV of course :-)

-- 
Eric S Fraga, ericsfraga@<most social media>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EARECAB0WIQSPXCedOQfhSlwpVw3IkZPY//z2fQUCWUUwsgAKCRDIkZPY//z2
fYr2AJ492kGPTwJigTXgoi24uz0Yh333mwCfXH4Pb8cx/ulKCEitKAcdZr67CWo=
=Jrd+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--