From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers landed on master Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:12:51 +0200 Organization: not if I can help it Message-ID: <87o9srj6kc.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83k23jl5ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8yjcem0.fsf@gmail.com> <8337a3j8te.fsf@gnu.org> <87shi3j8kt.fsf@gmail.com> <83zicbhs8c.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499792230 11481 195.159.176.226 (11 Jul 2017 16:57:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:57:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 11 18:57:04 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUyTA-0002XN-Ad for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:57:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47599 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUyTD-0000aI-PR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUxml-0002aT-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:13:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUxmg-0007W3-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:13:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=53360 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUxmg-0007VR-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUxmR-0000ZQ-LQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:12:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:+XUX8olwOGrbawcdwdbKA56L9Is= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216489 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:29:22 +0200 >> >> I can live with it, it just looks a little jarring when there are >> continuation lines. > > OTOH, you immediately see very clearly where the current physical line > ends. True > Anyway, I will wait for additional opinions. > > Btw, if I were to do this, what other face attributes would you expect > to see removed from the empty fields, in addition to background color? > Or do you simply want them to be displayed using the line-number face > instead? (That could be a different font size.) I'd expect it to use the line-number face. I confidently predict opinions will differ here :-) BTW, since we're discussing options, I definitely don't want a configuration variable, let's just decide one way or the other. Regards Robert