From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About curly quotes (again) [Was: Emacs 26.1 release branch created] Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:58:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87o9psaa8x.fsf@jane> References: <83377mls4d.fsf@gnu.org> <20170919173511.GA19168@ACM> <83bmm6h8vr.fsf@gnu.org> <20170919180944.GB19168@ACM> <838thah71i.fsf@gnu.org> <20170919194356.GC19168@ACM> <20170919210925.GF19168@ACM> <87y3paypfz.fsf@jane> <87efqxvf26.fsf@jane> <83377dboij.fsf@gnu.org> <87a81luru4.fsf@jane> <83ing8ak4v.fsf@gnu.org> <8760c6vqtz.fsf@jane> <87wp4ltz0a.fsf@jane> <83d1698zke.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506758375 20410 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2017 07:59:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 07:59:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, jwiegley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, acm@muc.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 30 09:59:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyCgJ-0004X2-0H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:59:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38457 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyCgO-0001Tl-W9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 03:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyCft-0001TL-0R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 03:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyCfs-000417-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 03:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:56505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyCfm-0003yx-Th; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 03:58:55 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089AFE6B81; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:58:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V9kqCTs3Pe0F; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:58:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (apn-31-1-7-39.dynamic.gprs.plus.pl [31.1.7.39]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 025C6E6306; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:58:45 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <83d1698zke.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218961 Archived-At: On 2017-09-29, at 14:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Marcin Borkowski >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, jwiegley@gmail.com, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, acm@muc.de >> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:39:33 +0200 >> >> >> How about searching for (a) key bindings and (b) interactive codes? >> >> >> >> Best, >> > >> > Key bindings are all indexed. Interactive codes are described in a single section that is indexed. So I guess my answer will be still the same: just use index search. >> >> In theory, yes. But: `C-x '. > > Not sure what is your problem with this" "i C-x DEL RET" finds that > binding nicely. Funny: i C-x DEL RET works, but i C-x not. (OTOH, i C-x works again.) >> (Although this is obviously a bug/omission.) > > Is it? So probably yes, at least an inconsistency (a minor one, I admit). >> And the section on interactive codes is really long, and I search >> for it often enough that the curly quotes do annoy me. > > Again, not sure what's the problem. here's what I'd do: > > "i interactive code RET" followed by "C-s ^" (for example) How about C-s P? ;-) Best, -- Marcin Borkowski