Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> I'm not sure I'm okay with changing the behavior of
> forward/backward-to-indentation like that.  It's an incompatible
> change, isn't it?  The documentation doesn't seem to tell anything wrt
> the behavior in presence of fields, but that doesn't mean we can make
> such changes without considering the consequences.  Can you tell why
> you think this change is TRT?

Hmm, the more I look at it, the less I understand why these functions
even exist.  There are hardly any uses of them.  Maybe we should just do
this instead: