From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20412: 25.0.50; Port not respected by ffap Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:31:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87o918a56o.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <84sibq3ovz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="129921"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 20412@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marco Wahl Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 02 00:32:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htJcH-000XZ4-Rw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:32:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59500 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htJcG-0003w5-M4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htJcB-0003ue-5m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htJcA-0006O0-5J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htJcA-0006Na-0u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htJc9-0000d0-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:32:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 22:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20412 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 20412-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20412.15646986931010 (code B ref 20412); Thu, 01 Aug 2019 22:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20412) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 22:31:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55618 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htJbg-0000G0-OT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:31:32 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:47672) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htJbf-0000EX-8g for 20412@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:31:31 -0400 Original-Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htJbc-0004Tw-5F; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:31:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <84sibq3ovz.fsf@gmail.com> (Marco Wahl's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:22:56 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164292 Archived-At: Marco Wahl writes: > - Have the text '/ssh:root@127.0.0.1#2222:/root/' in buffer *scratch*. > - Put the cursor on the first slash. > - M-x find-file-at-point > > Result: the filespec with the port is not recognised. > > Patch proposal: [...] > - (file "--:\\\\$\\{\\}+<>@-Z_[:alpha:]~*?" "<@" "@>;.,!:") > + (file "--:\\\\$\\{\\}+<>@-Z_[:alpha:]~*?#" "<@" "@>;.,!:") I wonder whether this will lead to more false positives than the number of times it'll help with this syntax here. But since it does test whether the file exists, perhaps it's not a problem anyway. Anybody got an opinion here? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no