From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20891: emacs: Back off if .doc is not an Office document Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:59:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87o8xm3wz9.fsf@gnus.org> References: <1435144758.2326415.306422097.2EE346E7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <875zngd2v4.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87pni54vou.fsf@marxist.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="189820"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: era+emacs@iki.fi, 20891@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 08 22:00:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTBMa-000nHL-RL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 22:00:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60392 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTBMZ-0000hM-F6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 16:00:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52783) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTBMR-0000e8-UY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 16:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTBMQ-0005K1-Qr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 16:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTBMQ-0005Jx-N6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 16:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTBMQ-0002f7-L1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 16:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20891 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 20891-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20891.157324680110202 (code B ref 20891); Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20891) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2019 21:00:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTBMP-0002eU-98 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 16:00:01 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:53416) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTBMN-0002eL-Av for 20891@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:59:59 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTBMJ-0007HR-3I; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:59:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pni54vou.fsf@marxist.se> (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 06 Nov 2019 02:53:21 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171266 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Would implementing this risk make opening *.doc files slower for most > users? Perhaps that could make the trade-off not worth it. Other > than that, I see no problem with the proposal. I don't think it'd be any performance problem -- we'd just have to read the first 8 bytes of the file to see whether the magic sequence is there. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no