From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10539: 24.0.92; low display-time-interval makes Emacs slow Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 03:12:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87o80js7aq.fsf@web.de> References: <87zkdl93r0.fsf@web.de> <87o80rrheb.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17455"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 10539@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 30 03:13:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nkbfb-0004Ln-NT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 03:13:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32964 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nkbfa-00038F-80 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nkbfS-00037t-I0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nkbfS-0007Ms-8K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nkbfS-0005Db-2t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 01:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10539.165128117520047 (code B ref 10539); Sat, 30 Apr 2022 01:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2022 01:12:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55652 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nkbfL-0005DH-Kf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:12:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:49299) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nkbfH-0005Cz-Uj for 10539@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:12:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1651281165; bh=HKL4CC3RZPxueM8V/lcW8IMGvIxKdMZ8Ov3vo5m2MjE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LBmmrPp4SUNQ+GffIYwOGqOD53F+bIuuVauVeIR54KOnOHRpcsyOgIUJwCgTHewj/ V/eY0Qnod+HJauk0Tak+J5Dn3oxVt6GGDwsFgpBzDOAPPFRsGNXlKuWGGJxYEmSKKg 2zpNbyr7fVPviunR7BDDW57UgQtSIqN6jjz1J3z8= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([178.14.74.158]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MgRMB-1oLb6o3GAB-00hSy4; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 03:12:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o80rrheb.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 23 Apr 2022 16:41:48 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9+qCvuTJfMRvM7g+THeeoE8LvtPG88gYopuAZ+LEPfIJykt1kyY 9pAGxyL+dw1iN1oJKFJjQyy7NmyK6xYTckeQE9fwL1tqxyCewWR3RES3qeV8HLX8tXSuxzv jRo1pvc2UDGFQu1dOhc+0aFau3az6EDQDii01MXqjOBNVu0RkI7AlZ37nkF5WBzz3AtVBAm dgca+/v2KimFXExIhhQ6g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:gLpKuvfvUfA=:2D+Tmk/LxOAlpN5eLXwVn8 eEztzPkPCilDp6kGB0qLvTrdHGu83Xj+zlfAL3mmLLD/ZaTMN48SEuDqD8wHGqzWT/0pd743U xd97b3XQMfrUbMlfONrKz/YvubUrWVInir2xTvO/1Rzv0lZ/cJLgoyuHU97r0vD52Imgpu0tL wkuhGloOwLhTuNxlE+wDk6DJmK+1I9MMt7vZXHw1rtZ5jcIpFJqxG/Nag3DJTzDyMu3sDXfCG Ubjc/PKpSBcqu744C75oypGrogHSbVHDygI2GvZl5Xg3dh8BqfbfByMKbQfYj/54J7gmiJYnF YuVXP2Ibm5T+ManIkQQDalOpIzqdl1yb3NFl/U6wYed/CpwD9mYCIcQpc8rSZtwWcIixCcz2u 7Kn+kPDxoc0GxNc5vMn5L39LoE0cHppR62Wjy5gmGF3Y+l4HQACAdMw4ZrUNfqkFgK8Ruj8Xz 5/17o9pJ9vpIBG5nFZJzmlhh3TJLgl8MTeRLmya4I7969VjZu4RZ7+krSNe0jjhY4IZ9rZHW6 +6+wCtVkJNknUfRhDAosU2hhiNeqJ76N/8ncAHfMHlJ3iEqkod8Vcr2HydzRAcwmMRuR8SKvC CttB9mC7WbYw0q+yejyMhvvwax64Y/K7oZ+eqPGOb3KaApNFofJ/qMHDdXNcexq5InjARYPXd S+7orVE20c7WFz8e3tpdrPh8Nkit4ZFM1ArvciqcuSbknS0D0qSVxf5yJvHOCiykOPQu4De8O UurG5qEtk2wwHDCMVZS2ZA3exl/EG8g0DemREBsLudsUi4FMi6roI1V2F/JGtAjbyCzBD2kk X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:230990 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I've tried this in Emacs 29, and the Emacs in question does not show > up on "top" as consuming any CPU, so this has perhaps improved? Maybe, I dunno. Everything currently looks quite sane here, no problem. > As noted in the bug thread, `force-mode-line-update' just sets some > variables to make the next redisplay cycle update the mode lines, so > the doc string is correct, I think. Probably right. > The discussion then went on to adding some more comments or something, > but I'm not sure whether there's anything more to be done here? I haven't checked if everyone has committed every suggested aspect of improvements to the docs. If nobody else answers, you might close, from my side. Thanks, Michael.