From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57400: 29.0.50; Support sending patches from VC directly Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 11:42:35 +0000 Message-ID: <87o7unkggk.fsf@posteo.net> References: <84v8qgn1z9.fsf@iki.fi> <87h71zo3p8.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfljmgwz.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1twvima.fsf@posteo.net> <84sfk2p846.fsf@iki.fi> <87h70i9ntt.fsf@posteo.net> <87edvl6vbj.fsf@gmail.com> <8735c1nn3y.fsf@posteo.net> <877d1d6rcy.fsf@gmail.com> <867d1cjc8w.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16013"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Robert Pluim , 57400@debbugs.gnu.org, Antoine Kalmbach To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 07 16:25:50 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ogoIQ-0003z0-3U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 16:25:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53806 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogoIP-0004Oo-3C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:25:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oglks-0004IK-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:43:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oglks-0003u0-BE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oglks-0003OW-0k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 11:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57400.166514297013032 (code B ref 57400); Fri, 07 Oct 2022 11:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2022 11:42:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oglkg-0003O6-Bi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:42:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:57345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oglke-0003Nt-GX for 57400@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3D4240027 for <57400@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 13:42:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1665142962; bh=3WcMhOMFxQbNEwvS/A2W0PyXAI2nIapDWi/ZnViKbkg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=lcg7j5AkVMTog9Opxu2UG6FWbSnyxWR6ZQ/UpU4YCqHLrvUMoV+w9NqpICcydwoD6 qgBzwE2E/L9t3dJdbkL1nnUaT9eJWDHQrtKEMMK7oNzonZjqq1av0yiqzMEcSDrbdo PLEht1CXW4seprnlCS9dTJJcy/N8M7ci/wjvrfomGorQXpdKQGTaYISOf7AMIdiVv6 ohjZ9DQbnyV0ZlZndtUJWnNwmol5pc97TQw7P/Pvxeiib0+GrmXyQJxpK/omyr7D81 WO/jmMF7K+VoYs/vNOzi+J1EI9S3f6oE2CN05sKZG4GRoDXrqvQmkkr9xvKnmJyfxC lwAHz4aX48u4w== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MkRJ05Mc3z6tmR; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 13:42:40 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <867d1cjc8w.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:58:55 +0300") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:244785 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: >>> If you have a better name, there is no better time to change it than no= w. >> >> `vc-prepare-patch-attach'? `vc-prepare-patch-attach-patches'? It=CA=BCs = all >> a bit of a mouthful to type, and it doesn=CA=BCt feel like much of an >> improvement over what you have. > > We could base the name of the existing commands. There is the command > 'submit-emacs-patch', so the corresponding VC command could be > 'vc-submit-patch'. Also like the existing command 'git-send-email' > the name could be 'vc-send-patch'. So should I rename the command? I'm not committed to any name. > Also please note that the most convenient way to select revisions > to submit is to show the log buffer, and use 'm' to mark revisions > (log-view-toggle-mark-entry). Then 'log-view-get-marked' returns > all marked revisions. This is supported, but currently not in this order. Do you think an option should be added that would use recursive editing to prompt the user? > I suggest to push the current version of the patch, then such marking > could be added later. OK, I'll do so later today.