From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61307: 30.0.50; pixel-scroll-precision-mode: window-scroll-functions? Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 04:44:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87o7pyb556.fsf@web.de> References: <87y1pbsgu5.fsf@web.de> <83h6vzq9at.fsf@gnu.org> <878rhascr8.fsf@web.de> <83wn4ngjvp.fsf@gnu.org> <875yc6cnmk.fsf@web.de> <83mt5ifdhn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15168"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 61307@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 04:46:27 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pRPnP-0003nD-B3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 04:46:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRPn3-0004Zt-24; Sun, 12 Feb 2023 22:46:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRPn0-0004Zc-TD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2023 22:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRPn0-0007Tm-KY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2023 22:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pRPn0-0007n7-CV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2023 22:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 03:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61307 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61307-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61307.167625990529859 (code B ref 61307); Mon, 13 Feb 2023 03:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2023 03:45:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47310 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pRPm4-0007lX-Rh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2023 22:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:34191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pRPm2-0007kl-C2 for 61307@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2023 22:45:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1676259894; bh=8YsHApEV0UP2uayuQA1QTccN9XgqnO0acAqny8ao/Ys=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=RKo6TTafHjmExTlSYUp5a6KG8oyBiBvlgFZlg99wuMC4iD6ondHrXzFn4OKgc/6uX 7bFQjnmpNbpEpncfYLcyzQalmeSK9e5vsgokbD9zBNFPrBOF1TJ65smiEdUcuPMIve 0NIorsNShzWCxnP2sT45KH9uyS9hSuU1kShzm/T4tMYDEeLHIrntR3TEKVbKojw/uD i7JkVfRN+uodHuMoJKXfL4HZfyFfVISWMZTyPZBO/mZbJKpW300wL/1I5ObS7strYg JnucMvqNjNkwFjl5jOvXmzY1+9EX0JxPqZQ3QyHopWX0XF6wr3DWfT/wh1h7Y9CnPj uM3AgIL+dNdKg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([84.59.210.57]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb005 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MdO56-1os51K04h6-00ZOVC; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 04:44:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83mt5ifdhn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2023 05:31:00 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:5QG/0xiaVwL6jUBKfJCoMYyq6Vtc+YBTwU1umWRNiPsQOBdHZFG 5kTjUD9mX6kf7K8Q0poiS4pzlXw6yKcS1aKM7Cs0KbBtkvN5Q+k7X+EOwVKhuoPqhTPJJ0S v2uI5p2W0hif1ekkIPCyl/XfV1lg/s/9w725mNDD8jIyhAeqkN1UwvEvL3AkruuoGLtqS39 qwYJbFi4I094tztWXy4PA== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:qM0z5o1gm0w=;RXMl/dRJ1vVk6NxIsR1cZPCsZoT MWvmJNivUWZ7ratkK+X6gefR7A+qRp7Mypd1f7MXVy8/wwNlR0o/fMdhz17XI/lPK88QluJdF cmun/U4ltqqm3rSPWU+jepkXVekLnjONGChaKT6QT2YbVgnLwT7/J6CSMSB6ftYg7xcMPq6p9 ApFuwEKVA1O/m0JQbXX7noru3frcykcfzsCgryeL3qJkXnhKMQVKezkUyAl8peIJZzehHegt5 vR4xMw5mC8r9cox8AR8ylg/2XfJQ9yguN+8PYsaKeMipsiTls2jAMe1tAfM43v6HjWSX8j/ly aw2mAC3gQdixzL1kJyrrZekERUuF1g6xegqiMbL3pnm9SY0LWJMxZt15lkIY2Q7xJpmiaR+BX C6EHEAMnuy5YRbdMVjftfpHNwp7Jv3FiZrzpjh7mSHJS82S3uipxl57rmdRenJsynzyNcy6Xo QMBIlmVzfkoFhoxtt0eEuifPzVPTHN4pEZV1K6LctHRBhLWpljt68y6ol5hcDgbLctJT3xuor tBQA6uPqyZ9DBCAvp1oserM+7ko5npRdMZFGHelCBZmTdFXLHD2Cr1Nd2A3RZgZRKgR83xKzc bNOzweChuVCKj9qHWNZSVhymMk+pdUGxtmif1DDYZuv5LnFa6Yuv6/dVAr9sNGVWiAK+7E7iG ypvl+1m0u7dDcum/KMzhyTGyrX5ztjFYWEJ3JqA5qrD4HAqQO9lQ9psp08ZrSOKwMxnmehjrg uj8gYvNlEXDQHdWNF7wJh058DMWLFd9fvKVP1eUCj2KXp5utqXCOmWb/MsvS3ylSetZjMD16 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255460 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Each command would be too often, I think, since this could be every > pixel. So I thought about some factor, perhaps configurable via a > variable, that would cause the call to be done every N pixels of > scroll. > > WDYT? Don't all other scroll commands scroll after every single command invocation? Why is this one different? The scroll amounts are finer grained, but the amounts are not smaller. AFAIU the w-scroll-functions would not be called for each single scrolled pixel. Michael.