From: Maks <mvproton@gmail.com>
To: 63101@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#63101: 30.0.50; nconc compiler optimization breaks user packages
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 18:57:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7na8wly.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
after long debugging time I figured out that commit
e6ca5834a6eab91023e9f968b65683d0a74db1e7 ('Improved nconc and append
compiler optimisations') breaks package vertico.el. I'm not completely
understanding how it works but try to describe the problem.
If I set breakpoint before breaking commit I get the following stacktrace:
```
Debugger entered--entering a function:
* vertico--affixate((#("report-emacs-bug" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("cd" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("5x5" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("arp" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("dbx" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("dig" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("erc" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("ert" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("eww" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("ftp" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference)))))
vertico--arrange-candidates()
vertico--exhibit()
```
, but after breaking commit I get slightly different stacktrace:
```
Debugger entered--entering a function:
* vertico--affixate((#("report-emacs-bug" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("cd" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("5x5" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("arp" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("dbx" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("dig" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("erc" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("ert" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("eww" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) #("ftp" 0 1 (face (completions-first-difference))) . 0))
vertico--arrange-candidates()
vertico--exhibit()
```
As you can see, the difference is in the tail of the input list. This
list comes from completion-hilit-commonality function from
minibuffer.el and it has nconc call. But testing
completion-hilit-commonality in REPL separetely from vertico.el package
give the same result (with 0 at the end of list).
Before sending this report I have tried a lot of versions of the
vertico.el package and have the same result. So I tend to think that problem is not directly
related to package.
reply other threads:[~2023-04-26 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o7na8wly.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=mvproton@gmail.com \
--cc=63101@debbugs.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.