all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
To: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de>
Cc: Samuel Loury <konubinix@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches [Was: [BUG?] Matching tags: & operator no more implicit between tags and special property]
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 07:32:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7iw7v4q.fsf@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <748acab1-eaf4-fdd3-13a6-26e6229de613@vodafonemail.de>

Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de> writes:

>> When "TAG1-TAG2" is an actual tag name with dash, we may allow escaping.
>
> But I'd like to clarify that.  From the Org syntax
>
>   https://orgmode.org/worg/org-syntax.html#Headings
>
> I understood that tag names cannot contain minus characters,
> and `org-tag-re' does not match any, either.  So we are talking
> about property names only, right?

You are right.

> Then the question is what quoting scheme to use for property
> names.  The previous one used before my commit f689eb4
>
>   (A) "\\-" => "-"
>
> never has been documented and never has been working properly,
> since the *matching* of these was done on *prop* names, but
> the *unescaping* on *tag* names.  So we are basically free to
> come up with something new.
>
> Some obvious choice would be a simpler single backslash
>
>   (B) "\-" => "-"

I prefer (B). And we will need to allow escaping of the "\" itself. Like
\\.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-24  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-23  7:57 [BUG?] Matching tags: & operator no more implicit between tags and special property Samuel Loury
2023-08-23 10:21 ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-23 10:37   ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-23 10:31 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-23 10:38   ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-23 14:00     ` [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches [Was: [BUG?] Matching tags: & operator no more implicit between tags and special property] Jens Schmidt
2023-08-23 15:55       ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-24  7:30         ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-24  7:32       ` Ihor Radchenko [this message]
2023-08-24  8:52         ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-25 18:46           ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-26 10:16             ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-26 11:53               ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-26 12:00                 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-26 12:19                   ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-26 12:22                     ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-26 12:54                       ` Jens Schmidt
2023-08-27  7:11                         ` Samuel Loury
2023-08-27  7:43                           ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 16:48                             ` Jens Schmidt
2023-09-01 23:59                               ` Tom Gillespie
2023-09-02  0:02                                 ` Tom Gillespie
2023-09-02  7:10                               ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 13:14                                 ` Redoing the current tag/property parser in a real grammar [was: Re: [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches] Jens Schmidt
2023-09-03  7:04                                   ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 13:18                                 ` [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches Jens Schmidt
2023-08-30 16:28                         ` [RFC] Quoting property names in tag/property matches [Was: [BUG?] Matching tags: & operator no more implicit between tags and special property] Jens Schmidt
2023-08-31  8:08                           ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-08-31 10:24                             ` Jens Schmidt
2023-09-03  6:53                         ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-03  9:25                           ` Jens Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7iw7v4q.fsf@localhost \
    --to=yantar92@posteo.net \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de \
    --cc=konubinix@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.