From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Choice of bug tracker Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:04:17 +0000 Message-ID: <87o7ins6r2.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ledwk4xi.fsf@gnu.org> <76ecf629-a41a-f6e4-f661-2ef926326d6c@gutov.dev> <83zg2cias7.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm37ie54.fsf@gnu.org> <831qfmhyx3.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm36kqlg.fsf@posteo.net> <87il8yuk6q.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ttsfts92.fsf@localhost> <87r0njtrdl.fsf@localhost> <87il8vtqwf.fsf@localhost> <835y4ve5sv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9668"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, brickviking@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 15:12:46 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhTa-0002Bo-IK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:12:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhLf-0008E9-S9; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:04:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhKv-0007HH-SO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:03:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbhKt-0007Yt-Gq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:03:49 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A7C1240028 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:03:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693487025; bh=u5m1LGxG3CBPlC0yGkV7xyrQ7Y1dUn9ChhNLxersbbI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=SG+S4KSsG0EgSpgmyXV/LcuaSzTRDeONiJR3BZEsuk+azMhH96hMlTBXOYVtvpkQ/ r3G8Fkv+ZiGxaElJxYF1gicyhLdkiQ9+bYGKnwpVmJejYY51A7dJS14wl9P9E29L9n S0vBS2364AEFCnX0WUqUDG97ahI3hTDYc6u6Iv6U3GcgDm4j1NxOd8FWXde16VYZgf ZBQNf+8e+xTvJdnD3OtARrNzOW2v5FU1iUmrXEM72p0UwY4ltFmgdG+scKHwRSVNu0 UQfLBtlgeFBg8/9ohe7tWe6HdxRUcvRuQz/f5pFhcczJK/nBKgyu2g6nxL3uV1LyGF IRJaYK3NDoUAQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Rc1Z770dTz9rxD; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:03:43 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <835y4ve5sv.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309652 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > The common approach is modern trackers is to create a new issue# for >> > every sub-discussion, and leave a link to it in the parent one. >> >> ... and it is what I dislike about modern trackers. >> Email threads make such branching trivial. > > It isn't trivial when people respond to several threads in the same > message. You can see examples of this on this list, just look at the > recent large threads. I can see how that is a problem. So, is it a +1 for "modern trackers" and -1 for "mailing lists"? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at