From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66743: 30.0.50; Crash when dumping reftex Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:55:37 +0000 Message-ID: <87o7gkcp1y.fsf@localhost> References: <875y2v592c.fsf@localhost> <83a5s6kgxx.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmvadfkw.fsf@localhost> <87cyx1d91n.fsf@localhost> <871qdhd2dh.fsf@localhost> <835y2th9gn.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttqdbmy7.fsf@localhost> <831qdhh6vd.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7glbk6w.fsf@localhost> <83wmv9frp1.fsf@gnu.org> <87il6tbjkp.fsf@localhost> <83sf5xfr7u.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyx1bikg.fsf@localhost> <83pm11fko1.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttqccu19.fsf@localhost> <83r0lge4ea.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14374"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, 66743@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 27 12:54:46 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKUH-0003Yy-VF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:54:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKU4-0003Pr-PP; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 06:54:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKU3-0003Pe-8i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 06:54:31 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKU2-0007f3-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 06:54:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKUY-0005vo-16 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 06:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66743.169840407322752 (code B ref 66743); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2023 10:54:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35220 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKU5-0005uu-C9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 06:54:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:34351) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKU3-0005uZ-AB for 66743@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 06:54:32 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 148E624002D for <66743@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:53:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1698404034; bh=lF9JqC1Lxac0uLqPIbNGuDZouNsOMqyF2YpX30Z43v8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=YM7hjXc7x3EYBCZXZ6VtNkeq3k61CfNyMAaubneeqUoRbRFaaGacfkGFBS/jYpDj7 vmlo5x/bI2tHUrO20twi+L7bZXpJxNdHXOxiS9lrFvXG1O3UmLuViz42FAyRgB4g7h qGvOK/PufNbUMWISCcIIbhL1ZRqlh13RvmgGMqBeo2XEUq1eBxG0+WgXQvlidoCM/j /WRSbG/MhYXvUGn3E2Re+C1XOcG6lLCi7gH/zyzJbLmIPhfv0Y5BPpFfcdz/E5w808 VHvSbrMQ/0Crq7tvxTTA1qbpLP4RaebxlzCctADCP7UB7HlEp3c+KOb873fxrRDekV PY+cCE5U4zDzQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4SH00140CXz6tvn; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:53:53 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83r0lge4ea.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:273367 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> If `error' does all the necessary cleanup, `emacs_abort' is indeed not >> necessary. But that's not very obvious from the source code. > > What cleanup is needed in this case? I have no idea. To be clear: I am not sure what is the difference between `emacs_abort' and `error'. I just noted that there is some and thus did not dare to touch the `emacs_abort' call to avoid unexpected breakage. If you say that using `error' instead of `emacs_abort' is safe, I will just follow. I expect that you know these details well. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at