From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "J.P." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67220: 30.0.50; ERC 5.6: Prefer parameter-driven MODE processing in ERC Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:14:39 -0800 Message-ID: <87o7cabou8.fsf__17761.7989176483$1708478166$gmane$org@neverwas.me> References: <87pm0aphr2.fsf@neverwas.me> <871q9fhl8j.fsf@neverwas.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9412"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-erc@gnu.org To: 67220@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 21 02:15:58 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbDK-0002EB-9w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 02:15:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbD2-0003ma-Ta; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:15:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbD2-0003mR-7Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:15:40 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbD1-0006xJ-V7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:15:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbDN-00030w-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "J.P." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67220 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 67220-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67220.170847810811519 (code B ref 67220); Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2024 01:15:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbCV-0002zh-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:15:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-108-mta69.mxroute.com ([136.175.108.69]:46595) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcbCT-0002zZ-Je for 67220@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from filter006.mxroute.com ([136.175.111.2] filter006.mxroute.com) (Authenticated sender: mN4UYu2MZsgR) by mail-108-mta69.mxroute.com (ZoneMTA) with ESMTPSA id 18dc93aae110000466.001 for <67220@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:14:42 +0000 X-Zone-Loop: 2166bb818205909a9e428b5a86745842f7f50a4e003e X-Originating-IP: [136.175.111.2] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neverwas.me ; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/8iFSy28d3wuaEsbf8bUV8Un5onV81Hm3Dhu5a2W1sI=; b=B72Xnn8XU96sVTWMmq4WKyS3HB BGQeNAfeOskcB1C+6PR322TO19/QNyCeoFH7mo0+UcENij6cY4QH78BZFiRaylFM4QWqj2IgWuPyf +oDVyS0dUhCzo+U7KYkWVmRm5MW3/7pzj9QdC2KFExqc/2andd52LiQalwisVbvApABcBeu+oi8H6 zOAb+SRZT9Dft7lw6KalSruza3Rl5ErZKeaxglhK3glUowh48jHnZpxv1DZQU2y7bf+SLlPNawiwj DiDHR7FqXTFKPUB9qRvIKlxB16IDLZKxw8e5C4HFV5YLRau6HVGGZlVq0N6DIC9f7tJGMiopumNjA N44mnZSA==; In-Reply-To: <871q9fhl8j.fsf@neverwas.me> (J. P.'s message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:45:32 -0800") X-Authenticated-Id: masked@neverwas.me X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280366 Archived-At: "J.P." writes: > It turns out a not entirely frivolous use case for abiding by that RFC > draft and *not* distinguishing between the two forms has arisen. > Basically, a server may choose to support no channels whatsoever for a > subset of clients, limiting them to direct messages only. To accommodate > this, ERC will need to interpret both "CHANTYPES" and "CHANTYPES=" as > expressing such a policy instead of sticking with its current behavior > of only doing so for the "=" form and treating "CHANTYPES" as equivalent > to ${default/fallback} (and thus also to "-CHANTYPES", which is clearly > wrong). > > I think it's worth correcting this in ERC 5.6. Proposed changes > attached. (The first patch is unrelated.) These changes now live on master as 3d87e343276 * Use modern fallback for channel name detection in ERC 25d15391f26 * Normalize ISUPPORT params with empty values in ERC If anyone experiences new difficulties related to detecting channel names, these are likely to blame.