From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags-regen-mode: handling extensionless files Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:21:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87o74c1ce1.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> References: <87tteaznog.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <8734lrrj4e.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7677"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 25 08:23:06 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1stLQX-0001pb-Lr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:23:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stLPe-0002AJ-TY; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 02:22:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stLPb-0002A8-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 02:22:07 -0400 Original-Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stLPX-00078J-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 02:22:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=tk3JSMVWxOvtMfDy02uAJ9TgPdMz1efd7rRxdtkt/kV5ioHGbDqVzP56oNHid4cYUAOFmSIU0JMTRC4oxyqNtN00TPx4VxepEo3woD77C2HLAoC72h6gWMWHmW9x+zasvYnzKGE3k+/EwU1LRNKb3Op8vmOA8eLomH5Qxwk4G3ymZfpd3qLdYrWbizbkAw/Qa1seJruoVcefUdVeUfyfS0IAM4reMQBItOZ+zcqAi2d/Bn2FtqHJrPbh7Lwx9cdqYoBzkUBy4kxKNo0aguWk/H355SG75rdZbaVPWFeV+VpaL+AsuFgOLekz203lYJJt6nxS3XvOk3XRorHK0u8Udw==; s=purelymail1; d=spwhitton.name; v=1; bh=bYrxVJ+vjPONbgSid4AotoqJVGwZKC5cbb87+VmIHv0=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=YAOfPfCmCHo2mrk9vF21oNKMEwzqziCpU3IfwFJAl1WtJNSmgnxid+4apD4o8mJ1q8h+ZMoqZy41FgqoRy3Rt0qjNUN6hT32svyY+saLYTTZ1Jd37eN11PnvUbkQ7SP7lMAFqrr8rezEk6zfKpw3Y7mG4Zjk5XfUkgWX1b5KFIIg712bTljP2moBdZ0CgFZ0eb7OXXsOuh5lE+ByI+Oy5bJUlaGjhlORh/rjr2W/a0RMY/e14swgfk5ebJSbVNt5pI3mtpXpS3xeqz8+XpRn7GRO6l8ZuOVaQXyH9VPnoRKUjSCuWlSBhE9x9e7kFiLVsonHw833JYmMQahLiGgUCg==; s=purelymail1; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=bYrxVJ+vjPONbgSid4AotoqJVGwZKC5cbb87+VmIHv0=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; Feedback-ID: 20115:3760:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id -1360090772; (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Wed, 25 Sep 2024 06:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by zephyr.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C11A6949F2A; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:21:58 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2024 20:00:04 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=34.202.193.197; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=sendmail.purelymail.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324051 Archived-At: Hello, On Mon 23 Sep 2024 at 08:00pm +03, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 22/09/2024 15:02, Sean Whitton wrote: > >>> But see my other email regarding etags' hashbang detection. >> Hashbang detection would solve my problem elegantly. >> Is my reading of the other thread correct that if we can fix the fortran >> fallback then we can enable the hashbang detection? > > Yep, I think so. > > We would probably also discuss etags' auto-detection and its list of default > extensions, during the next release's development. Okay, cool! Should we have a bug to track this? -- Sean Whitton