From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*? Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 14:22:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87o7358yu4.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87a5f2xir8.fsf@web.de> <87froszrs6.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87ed48b3er.fsf_-_@melete.silentflame.com> <87a5ew5few.fsf@web.de> <87msipkisv.fsf@web.de> <871q01am6t.fsf@gmx.de> <87ed41kcuk.fsf@web.de> <87wmht93dv.fsf@gmx.de> <87a5epk9va.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Michael Albinus Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11389"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 73853@debbugs.gnu.org, jporterbugs@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, spwhitton@spwhitton.name To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 27 14:23:49 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t53FE-0002q9-PM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 14:23:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t53Ev-0007Iv-Ry; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:23:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t53Et-0007IM-QJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t53Et-0006xP-Hh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:23:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=JfCiP4mpQIRTYcCuaut00caOc6/nvDAEECevGcip8oc=; b=mBu7EVjCqvLpJFr148ZC8n91S7if4D6F2rSbbdDyh5+dKpizqPTt+8clRAJ4DFmCRdTkvTgUoJ/JGoiWwg8/UkjJntaYgkaTbK1uN0BoT99wGDtPbG8Q11P0TpV9zWjoyAV60OXc8HDWA7hXfAU61XGDh2JsW+e1X4y4bUkHbHcxhHLPpxMLFQNlo8H3lgnfLT6cKhzxeIWQ8XEfhe/7Ts8oiPmWhleRhFZkxnnVBkwbnf6YzJqG7RuKYLTxW2u+kJ4NwyYhDKdPiMTUDfE2/KUYb1W+5EuwLursQVcxq0Yy6t6aYYSQo5xmYkVkSRZw9n82pl+uCCra+LullvRSNQ==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t53FS-00061r-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73853 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 73853@debbugs.gnu.org, Jim Porter , "Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" , Stefan Kangas , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Sean Whitton Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.173003542023145 (code B ref -1); Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2024 13:23:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44271 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t53F6-00061E-1u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t53F2-00060t-6a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:23:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t53ES-0007HQ-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t53ER-0006wD-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:23:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1730035365; x=1730640165; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=JfCiP4mpQIRTYcCuaut00caOc6/nvDAEECevGcip8oc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=FFTPBH8o6jMrnkpiKb4q5boI1WVg+8pJkWdIxIwjWb+HPXmOZbNA/Cdpd8QGf82+ JNxcH6KqD+8iMAUhG4dF1id5RrvHg4Z/X6UNDo+Uod8JtRASEdc8b6IbSxks0IGUj b2KyYHFO2CaXJkIVGqVdGkSp2ZPLRLBbJKPagJGeSaL76YDprr3wi41RZaNPYZeig qKEPUYFVJh4I+dYEMElGX8S3I/KOUqXQH0OjZFf8b0fcG6Gsn9r8W/emxtXbRgp7i 2bqYaiMO1cR/MaNB6Np574/xjiCm4efGfBzs/g2z1a/o6GqmiSxlo/8+Zn1qdx94C pTZYoQ6okgX0a4h8lg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.38.155]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M42jK-1t53ED2xLE-005qBk; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 14:22:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a5epk9va.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:28:57 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:u02MjOc4k/cb/NgOOG1+uYHhNDmr/m1kjTkqTykGTbEi/FmnFrQ BGvTa1YHi0ZNkTVW8V7I4zQXiA+KmdcwTnvLUvOQLZ10T+EKhGmQkl0H+V7J3JRJuwlmWtj S/IUsTDRuOWOR2pb/3nY9aqTOYHAyDAgmY9eKh4No5WbVBlJj2fraDwsIdsPhL3CPoFtQWN JmVG5nUmWDBxjlPM/5kJA== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:cWonCttWQNY=;7jGHwH8lqg0GEuBP1JJVAFzdSPe j8Mc0QcjqCH8rAV2WGqMEeRsqRELvLE0lBwrlSyM4z9fbYT+bt54ywM5zaGR5iPplvw3rPsVA ddeTtYfkg8w/eNRrt+NTe4ZWVtsTE3+PlQyZSxu9I+9aEV5k8WHDccpoRVP0nK4NA7Pzmdvkn S4TJdsXUpT9YN09bdXXTPX+VwFHdVvus3nfOZmhp8pmEfEZJ7RfaPv6VmRAVrXaW91S/geJzp tdNfyvJAV2JFxQdobxqSuHMzXTumnfggPNomzbhqSuky2TNP3aXGQl5A8OcAdApPOY/Fs3s4S ludNyJ8hfUCVZ19QZur4HUYK6NRASELF9y/HZE2l1jpITxvvYc8//88k+1E9nwwkFhVIe+FO4 +qlpcOI87kvVU9qFZzlGbr6myLrTdtY6HeHLXndU4AJYKptuHWKTIiklEfTh28VJMyb8o4M3L S8vlc/HkhRJuR/zgdPBb5MYN8rwgZOc+SORkL0nhMZam5uGZfgBNeqENIqECBZ7wPE0pveJF3 hxzr8JqlZ7q5kBDEslOQqtZV85cDxR1J5PgLjgNRnjqYv+ZI73H90H3lJguTsH2sdWVdk9BSp MCP9NbvTblkacpeFtAZed4kn/LH5FErFAKrrkLyxGsGu2k9bhZskoVPw7tQuPeO6w5F3BwJgn /KnVGADerPgfvgmGXbdsU+hvdahh4eUVzvUzUlOxiFd4bvC+2aSJ8w4jvwPh+zuEeqm+2fPaG 0tpUosU5zKYjHLWpQS6KlMwLexRnc7B05MGy3JD8iWb4t4p7W2fCl5rODrC0ayAG/F9AB9Tn Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.19; envelope-from=michael.albinus@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:294354 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: Hi Michael. >> I'm not impatient, other people are. Blaming (for example) Tramp for >> the compilation warnings in master. > > If you are not impatient: please explain why you are sure that this will > not pop up in, say 18 months, again. Or why it is better to handle this > corner issue in 7 steps spread over an quarter of a century. I don't know whether this happens. But I buy the reasoning, that if-let* and when-let* are closed to let*, given the semantics. > Sorry for the sarcasm, but I miss the weighing up in what you say. Only > pointing to annoyances counts but doesn't convince me that one solution > is better than the other. But you're too late. The whole codebase has been changed already, and this is much more but an annpyance. I don't see a glaring reason to revert this. > Michael. Best regards, Michael.