From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Paul Wallington Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: dotfile spam rmail emacs Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 01:07:07 +0100 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87n0dwq7ys.fsf@indigo.shootybangbang.com> References: <874r06n4fd.fsf@indigo.shootybangbang.com> <87oeyewmwd.fsf@indigo.shootybangbang.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1061943514 13653 80.91.224.253 (27 Aug 2003 00:18:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 27 02:18:33 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ro1A-0007PV-00 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 02:18:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19ro0J-00047g-QZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:17:39 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!host217-44-221-169.range217-44.btcentralplus.COM!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 15 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-44-221-169.range217-44.btcentralplus.com (217.44.221.169) Original-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1061942924 9933026 217.44.221.169 (16 [170119]) X-Orig-Path: indigo.shootybangbang.com!news X-Attribution: jpw X-Face: R(_z-rF:grdKO.*u`n); p.i$Eiz=h^CO5eDYv"4:K@#\HN09*Ykx}}B{kF/KH}%f_o^Wp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:12083 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:12083 kgold@watson.ibm.com (kgold) wrote: > However, I've found that filtering on contents really slows down > RMAIL. Hm. Its performance is adequate here. However, most of the mails I get are short. > Since X-Spam-Flag is really a header, is there any way to tell > rmail-spam-filter that, so it doesn't have to parse the entire > contents? Or is that a feature request? I don't see one, perhaps I am being dense. Irrespective of speed, correctness is important (I guess saying "^X-Spam-Flag: YES" is a little more specific). I think it's a very good idea for a feature.