From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jmarant@nerim.net (=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ECB Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:50:39 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87n02bpmn4.fsf@marant.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089233341 3087 80.91.224.253 (7 Jul 2004 20:49:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 20:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "'emacs-devel@gnu.org'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 07 22:48:54 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BiJLa-0006u9-00 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:48:54 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BiJLa-0000hd-00 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:48:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BiJNf-00033H-4i for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BiJNa-000313-G8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BiJNW-0002yu-TD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:50:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BiJNW-0002yr-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.4.17.103] (helo=mallaury.noc.nerim.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BiJKt-0005vP-GB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from amboise (jmarant.net1.nerim.net [62.212.105.6]) by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBEF62DEB; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 22:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by amboise (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B7DAE2C1D9; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 22:50:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: "Berndl, Klaus" In-Reply-To: (Klaus Berndl's message of "Wed, 7 Jul 2004 18:57:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25535 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25535 "Berndl, Klaus" writes: > Berndl, Klaus wrote: >>>> The biggest difference between ECB and speedbar is that speedbar >>>> always appears in a seperate frame (it can be forced into another >>>> frame, but it is not easy), whereas ECB has several layout options, >>>> AFAIK all of which use windows within the current frame. Many people >>>> are used to working in other programs within the same frame, so they >>>> may see this as an improvement over speedbar. >>=20 >>> IIRC, ECB uses tree-widget, which has recently been added to the >>> Emacs trunk. I think this is what you compare with speedbar. >>=20 >> No, ECB doesn't use the tree-widget lib it uses its own tree-library! My apologies. While unpacking ecb, I was confused with tree-buffer.el which my mind turned into tree-widget.el :-) Cheers, --=20 J=E9r=F4me Marant