Re: Use ido for *all* completion?

[Oliver Scholz <alkibiades@gmx.de>]

Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> writes:

> Oliver Scholz <alkibiades@gmx.de> writes:
>
>> Yes.
>
> And don't you agree that while they both show available completions,
> icomplete is nowhere near ido when it comes to functionality?  Or am I
> missing something?

I don't recall having seen any list of required functionality. I do
remember that somebody wanted to use ido for other sorts of
completion. Such things most of the time mean: people want to have a
particular functionality and express that as "can X also do Y?" So
before we jump on anything without consideration and merge
gnu.emacs.help and emacs-devel, it would be quite more methodical to
find the least difficult way to achieve the required functionality.

    Oliver
-- 
20 Ventôse an 213 de la Révolution
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité!