From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: Diane Murray <disumu@x3y2z1.net>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Parsing URL attributes - url-mailto, url-imap, url-ldap broken?
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:50:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mz19twct.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Hd5GM-00009e-PK@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun\, 15 Apr 2007 09\:59\:30 -0400")
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> Is anyone working on this?
AFAICT, Diane Murray's analysis is correct. The 2006-10-09 change was
intended to parse http query strings better, but url-http apparently
doesn't use the result; on the other hand, url-mailto and other parts
of url that depended on the old behavior got broken.
Since Magnus Henoch has not responded, I went ahead and reverted the
patch that caused this problem. After the release, we can re-apply
the patch, and adapt url-mailto etc to the new behavior of
url-generic-parse-url.
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:02:56 +0200
> From: Diane Murray <disumu@x3y2z1.net>
> To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Parsing URL attributes - url-mailto, url-imap, url-ldap broken?
>
> I just noticed that `url-mailto' doesn't parse URLs with query
> arguments like it used to. If I call
> (url-retrieve-synchronously "mailto:ml+atest@x3y2z1.net?subject=testing")
> the word "testing" should be inserted in the Subject field, but it
> isn't. In Emacs CVS of 2006-09-19 it does that. I'm assuming after
> because of the following changes, now it doesn't:
>
> 2006-10-09 Magnus Henoch <mange@freemail.hu>
>
> * url-parse.el (url-generic-parse-url): Handle URLs with empty
> path component and non-empty query component. Untangle path,
> query and fragment parsing code. Add references to RFC 3986 in
> comments.
> (url-recreate-url-attributes): Start query string with "?", not ";".
>
> I think `url-imap' and `url-ldap' won't work correctly either, from
> what I've seen in the source code.
>
> Since the change was probably made to parse http query strings better,
> and there is no such use of url-attributes in url-http.el, I believe
> it should be safe to somehow revert to the old way, since many of the
> other url scheme files depend on that way of doing things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-15 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-12 15:02 Parsing URL attributes - url-mailto, url-imap, url-ldap broken? Diane Murray
2007-04-14 3:02 ` Chong Yidong
2007-04-15 13:59 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-15 16:50 ` Chong Yidong [this message]
2007-04-16 4:31 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mz19twct.fsf@stupidchicken.com \
--to=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=disumu@x3y2z1.net \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.