From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-selection-mode Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:14:00 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87mxy4sbc7.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87ocitw2dl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <201003130001.o2D01FFQ003489@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <87vdd1yqe4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87eijjzrkd.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org> <20100317143519.GB4381@muc.de> <87vdcui6oh.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20100318101223.GB2704@muc.de> <400FB8EA6FB8499AB34297A77E9DCB49@us.oracle.com> <87bpelxyu7.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87vdcsvn2h.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <871vfgviny.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <0F1993E5BFE847B4AB312467B0CEC7F0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269004583 1253 80.91.229.12 (19 Mar 2010 13:16:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:16:23 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 19 14:16:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nsc3J-00069u-QD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:15:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58143 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nsc3I-0006a6-Sv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:15:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nsc3E-0006ZS-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51451 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nsc39-0006Wy-Ri for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nsc33-0006bL-2p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nsc32-0006az-Sw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:15:33 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nsc2d-0005PN-JD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:15:07 +0100 Original-Received: from p5b2c294b.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.44.41.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:15:07 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by p5b2c294b.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:15:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b2c294b.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:oCNVJXn1MDVd7j8sN1TJkPkURsI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122275 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> Then perhaps you should leave the discussion until those that remember >> life without delete-selection-mode have sorted out the problems with >> making it the default. > > No, please, don't make it the default. Don't go near it. Just leave it > alone. Go back to your Real Emacs Way. You'll be happy and so will > everyone else. The last thing d-s-mode needs is you sorting it out and > fixing its "problems". Don't even think about it. [...] > And yes, I will present arguments against any such proposals, if I > have any. If you restrict your output to those cases, it would significantly improve the signal to noise ratio of the solution finding process. -- David Kastrup