From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel Subject: Re: Emacs core TLS support Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:25:06 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87mxrjajd9.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <878wc1vfh3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r5ptpnz2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871vhsvkut.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d41csktn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4v0n0m8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrrvfnc4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r5i2d00q.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zkwqijye.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878w4actmg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hju123h.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8762yklrdk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrqzhrjv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwxmihyz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762ycfhqo.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8739tcch48.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4C8FC537.2020207@gnutls.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284513953 32506 80.91.229.12 (15 Sep 2010 01:25:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gnutls-devel@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 15 03:25:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ovgki-0002We-06 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:25:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34464 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ovgke-0004oQ-6R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:25:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45200 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvgkV-0004m0-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:25:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvgkQ-0002hG-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:25:19 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvgkQ-0002h5-2K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvgkM-0002Pt-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:25:14 +0200 Original-Received: from c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([24.14.16.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:25:14 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:25:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:errjD2LKAYsSZxWDoFoKS3x1zWs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130165 gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel:4511 Archived-At: On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:55:51 +0200 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: NM> On 09/14/2010 08:30 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> The simple client code is implemented in my current patch. Without >> verifying anything I keep getting GNUTLS_E_AGAIN when I try to handshake >> against an SSL server. See gnutls-boot, the control flow is really >> simple and I think correct. What am I missing? NM> GNUTLS_E_AGAIN is returned only if the transport layer function NM> (recv/send) return -1 and EAGAIN. Usually this is normal behavior and is NM> enough to loop around them. Do you use non-blocking IO? The I/O is on the underlying process file descriptors, which in our case are network sockets. I'm not actually sure of all the setup done on those sockets because Emacs' process.c is a bit of a labyrinth, but Simon Josefsson's original patch just used them directly and it worked for him. Ted