From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Lundin Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:39:18 -0500 Message-ID: <87mxmzfbw9.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87iq197ool.fsf@mail.bantercat.co.uk> <87pqveyct2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51444 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PewnK-0005SH-4I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:39:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PewnI-0006wJ-Rt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:39:22 -0500 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:59560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PewnI-0006vr-G4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:39:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> (Jason Dunsmore's message of "Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:02:50 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jason Dunsmore Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Hi Jason, Jason Dunsmore writes: > "Eric Schulte" writes: > >> I recall a discussion of holding a competition to select a new css style >> for Worg (found it here [1]). I think that such a change could >> fruitfully be combined with the Worg re-organization. > > I'm not a web-designer, but here's my stab at re-designing Worg: > http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/ > > I think a good addition to Worg would be the option to view it with or > without the javascript section folding. I personally prefer the entire > web page to be visible without clicking. Is there a way to do this I'm > not aware of? I agree that we should reconsider the use of folding on Worg (or at least provide alternate links to non-js views). To avoid the folding, you can use the following link: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html?VIEW=showall See http://orgmode.org/worg/code/org-info-js/#linking for more details. However, it still takes a second or two for org-info.js to rearrange the page. I do find that as a workaround adding some other (unsupported) string after VIEW results in a page without javascript. http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html?VIEW=none Best, Matt