From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Installing `struct buffer' patch Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:52:16 -0500 Message-ID: <87mxly7e4f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4D47DFD4.1040108@gmail.com> <87r5ba7ejz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297702357 27791 80.91.229.12 (14 Feb 2011 16:52:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 14 17:52:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp1f4-0002DN-Jg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:52:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58503 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pp1f4-00046X-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:52:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44838 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pp1eu-00044f-ML for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:52:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp1et-0004Sv-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:52:20 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]:42335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp1et-0004Sg-4k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:52:19 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036225012.central.yale.edu [128.36.225.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1EGqHk7009730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:52:17 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1CE161605B1; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:52:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:48:46 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136002 Archived-At: Tom Tromey writes: > Chong> What do you think about replacing B_ with lots of individual macros, > Chong> like BUF_UNDO_LIST, BUF_NAME, etc.? This might be ugly in buffer.h, but > Chong> the rest of the code would be more understandable. > > This is exactly what I did originally, but Stefan asked me to change it > to B_. Oh, right, I skimmed that discussion. How bout replacing B_ with something like BUFFER_VAR?