From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6113: 23.1.97; doc of :box face attibute Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:24:17 -0400 Message-ID: <87mxgwcitq.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <7F5B5320CDAB4337974A63C6C978386E@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309652734 19704 80.91.229.12 (3 Jul 2011 00:25:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 00:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6113@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 03 02:25:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdAV5-0003DP-4N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 02:25:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QdAV3-0000uK-RO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:25:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QdAUm-0000ra-0X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QdAUh-0001jn-A1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QdAUh-0001jh-35 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdAUg-0004Bj-7r; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 00:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6113 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6113-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6113.130965266616048 (code B ref 6113); Sun, 03 Jul 2011 00:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6113) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2011 00:24:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdAU6-0004Am-2O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:24:26 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdAU3-0004AZ-Qz for 6113@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:24:24 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036226015.central.yale.edu [128.36.226.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p630OHWX016587 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:24:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 03 Jul 2011 02:06:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:25:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47796 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > But I have no idea what a negative `line-width' would mean, and that > needs documentation. I've skimmed the C code that deals with > `line-width', but it's still rather obscure to me. Yeah, I documented it.