From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:22:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87mxeaar26.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <4E6C80BF.2060002@gmx.at> <4E6DCB0A.4060605@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315830174 12038 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2011 12:22:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:22:54 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 12 14:22:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R35XD-0002Rz-Jb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:22:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37504 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R35XD-0006w2-2z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:22:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R35X9-0006v2-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:22:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R35X3-0007Og-35 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:22:43 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44331) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R35X2-0007Ob-U4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:22:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R35X1-0002MC-Tr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:22:35 +0200 Original-Received: from 185.red-83-59-1.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.59.1.185]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:22:35 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 185.red-83-59-1.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:22:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.red-83-59-1.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:a9+pUNKrUwTjTsImNtPTnI0Svuw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143926 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Killing a buffer has never deleted a frame before. > > See the thread on bug#9419 for an explanation and how to > disable the behavior. That's a long thread and I just only skimmed over it, but the only frame of my Emacs session is deleted from time to time forcing me to create a new one with emacsclient (I'm using the daemon.) That's a bug.