From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:04:19 -0400 Message-ID: <87mxdtl9f0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87r5356aqu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316912678 2156 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2011 01:04:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 01:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9591@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 25 03:04:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7d8x-00009g-ON for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 03:04:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35728 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7d8w-0005Tu-Ux for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:04:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34237) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7d8u-0005Tm-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:04:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7d8t-00066Q-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:04:28 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7d8t-00066L-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:04:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7d9R-00004z-PR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:05:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 01:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9591 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9591-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9591.131691269832763 (code B ref 9591); Sun, 25 Sep 2011 01:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2011 01:04:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7d9N-0008WM-4B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7d9L-0008WG-8i for 9591@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:04:55 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp-128-36-14-81.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8P14JkR015294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:04:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:17 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:05:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51806 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Another fix might be for C-x k to use confirm-nonexistent-file-or-buffer > so that after you type TAB, Emacs prompts with [Confirm] when you try to > exit the minibuffer immediately. > > How would that change it? The buffer ` *message-viewer RMAIL*' did > exist. It would probably have stopped you from accidentally entering the internal buffer by typing RET quickly after TAB. I agree though that the completion behavior is a bit screwy: typing TAB into the empty minibuffer does not bring up the hidden buffers in the completion list, whereas the more agressive partial-completion method does bring them up.