From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion to indicate fixed version when closing a bug Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:20:24 -0500 Message-ID: <87mxb05dk7.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> References: <83d3bwn7mu.fsf@gnu.org> <5dhb18p7i7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <834nx8mcud.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5ukkucx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323552042 27345 80.91.229.12 (10 Dec 2011 21:20:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 22:20:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZULP-0000pj-T0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:20:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52781 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZULP-0005xJ-7J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:20:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZULM-0005xE-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:20:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZULL-0008HZ-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:20:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:62367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZULL-0008HV-9D; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: by qcsd17 with SMTP id d17so3290248qcs.0 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:20:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=YmoG2Zpijd4vOGXmzy8obP3lCd4VvVbBEDgfUwIIhQ0=; b=echvDeU2ot7YIeiJ7UoFGNkTjIQUOhkHtx6Eht2h8pXQwz6L2Euus6H0fAVgqK0WUi aXPug9OBrniPt2OuF/ZGfF13tw1Vp9/6RFZpg43hMxOj37naCOdc2j8ZYfysxOcNaCXH XuUYWC+kizrNZcBBwizrNYK+4oszqST5thHC4= Original-Received: by 10.229.225.14 with SMTP id iq14mr3089818qcb.265.1323552026869; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:20:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from floss.red-bean.com (cpe-66-65-49-129.nyc.res.rr.com. [66.65.49.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j7sm25555886qaq.11.2011.12.10.13.20.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:20:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:17:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.216.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146629 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: >It's just my opinion that is is useful and not much effort. >Maybe just use "24.1", rather than worrying about pretest versions, if >you don't think it is very useful. Oh, I totally misunderstood what you were proposing, Glenn, sorry. You meant the version number ("edition", "release", whatever) of Emacs in which the bug was fixed, not revision information about the change that fixed it. The latter is what I've been (mistakenly) talking about in this thread; I'll shut up now, as I have no strong opinion about including the version number, though I'll try to remember to do it. I'm rarely aware of what Emacs version I'm running, since I'm just building from bzr. -Karl