From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nix Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CL package serious deficiencies Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:30:58 +0000 Message-ID: <87mx8ubab1.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> References: <33271707.post@talk.nabble.com> <87fwemcwlx.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87zkcubbfc.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87vcnibb9t.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87r4y6bams.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328650268 2358 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 21:31:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: egnarts-ms , Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 22:31:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruscz-00084z-Rn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:31:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33595 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruscz-0006bC-EV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:31:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruscw-0006b5-Es for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruscv-0001X3-GR for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:39035 helo=mail.esperi.org.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruscv-0001Wf-6p for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:31:01 -0500 Original-Received: from esperi.org.uk (nix@spindle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.15]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q17LUwe5000768; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:30:58 GMT Original-Received: (from nix@localhost) by esperi.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q17LUw4L022847; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:30:58 GMT Emacs: ballast for RAM. In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 7 Feb 2012 22:29:41 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-URT-Metrics: spindle 1060; Body=5 Fuz1=5 Fuz2=5 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 81.187.191.129 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148321 Archived-At: On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman stated: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:23, Nix wrote: >> On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman spake thusly: >> >> >> So as a result, if one of us wants to use `cadr' in ordinary Lisp >> functions that are part of Emacs, we can, but if we want to use `caddr', >> we can't. Now does that restriction make any sense at all? I'd say it > > I am using caddr quite a lot. Without any whining byte-compiler or > other problems... ;-) Ah, there's a macro implementation I overlooked 'cos I have cl loaded at runtime :) -- NULL && (void)