From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r107925: Regenerate etc/refcards/*.pdf Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:27:28 +0200 Organization: GNU Message-ID: <87mx5sxq4v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5kpqapmc6m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <0ry5pcvjmr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335860795 21696 80.91.229.3 (1 May 2012 08:26:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 08:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 01 10:26:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SP8Pq-0001DN-Jl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 10:26:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SP8Pp-0006sm-Ry for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 04:26:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55757) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SP8Pn-0006sZ-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 04:26:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SP8Pl-0003tk-PR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 04:26:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:33810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SP8Pl-0003tP-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 04:26:29 -0400 Original-Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so2739057wib.12 for ; Tue, 01 May 2012 01:26:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:organization:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=6bX4GzyFMKdJObVQmWs1zh+CmtyBKjEWo800IVNoW64=; b=jFF0pxj+YJgA+kH9mKlfSQzoRWXY4Tm4DknG0bOEDQ3/FlJEL0U3jvDA3W6GrpI7DI l/JJ5zSnK85LQUs4iEha9KEEh4Gij+E/kVZ8tBfqHbvvMeG8gQWvJwNKrgpbw3gqogCn tAaunB+A7B/ViWc/IqVqa92OfA7oI7smuQuZa9caOlXBayz4WlApR8/0fGoaKXepiHo9 puHi1XGTI3pBM0lugYATE85ISivGsNepmGSiieffF9K3ApTrQSm5Th06ulp73dwHKde5 7mrHeTYjLlKHPJzm1VBv39lDeEfzCaCKD03vHV0ewUaHnJQNM2HsPpRiDghqeHq/Xgf8 Vl7Q== Original-Received: by 10.216.201.5 with SMTP id a5mr10583717weo.20.1335860787250; Tue, 01 May 2012 01:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from myhost.localdomain (pha75-11-82-236-86-204.fbx.proxad.net. [82.236.86.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm34641734wiz.1.2012.05.01.01.26.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 May 2012 01:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD4C2856E; Tue, 1 May 2012 10:27:28 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Tue, 01 May 2012 13:33:28 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.212.177 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150171 Archived-At: Leo writes: > On 2012-05-01 08:18 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: >> Personally, I think it would be fine these days to treat the refcard >> pdfs like the info files. Don't keep them in the repo, but include them >> in the release tarfiles (just need to make make-dist gripe/build them if >> they are not found in the source tree). Every halfway modern GNU/Linux >> system has suitable (optional) TeX packages. And it's not like these >> pdfs have real changes very often. > > I agree. FWIW I do agree too. -- Bastien