From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12078: 24.1; Improve the I-search prompt Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:06:19 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87mx25g64k.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87txwr2ylo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87d33esat8.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344413360 11473 80.91.229.3 (8 Aug 2012 08:09:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 08:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12078@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 08 10:09:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1KF-0002DN-HF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:09:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33359 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1KD-0002G2-SN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1K9-0002Dn-2n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1K8-0007ah-7A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:09:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1K8-0007ac-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:09:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1Ru-0006FK-Hz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 08:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12078.134441380523981 (code B ref 12078); Wed, 08 Aug 2012 08:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2012 08:16:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1Rc-0006Ek-Qv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:16:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:44081 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1Ra-0006Eb-Qr for 12078@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:16:43 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10534451CBA2; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 01:08:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:45:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62937 Archived-At: > However, on second thought, I think that the "failing" message is > actually unnecessary. Looking at the echo area, it is obvious whether > the current search is failing or not (if it's failing, the unmatched > text will be on a different face). After trying this I think the "[failing]" message doesn't look too nice. As you mentioned, it is unnecessary due to the `isearch-fail' face. But then this message still should be displayed in environments that don't support the `isearch-fail' face. The "[pending]" message should be changed too to address complaints that it's unclear what does it mean. Maybe something like "[Search type changed]" The "[wrapped]" message could be displayed only once after wrapping, like e.g. in Firefox that displays the message "Reached top of page, continued from bottom" or "Reached end of page, continued from top".