From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r111116: eval-after-load fix Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:54:22 +0900 Message-ID: <87mwwobaqp.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <878v8b839k.fsf@yandex.ru> <871ue3c5ek.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <50E669D2.6030808@yandex.ru> <87sj6hb4f0.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357354471 8467 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2013 02:54:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 02:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 05 03:54:48 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrJuH-0005es-8x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 03:54:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52045 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrJu1-0003a5-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:54:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrJtz-0003a0-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:54:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrJty-0007ui-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:54:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:56057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrJtx-0007ua-P3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:54:25 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C499708E6; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:54:22 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E5861A3222; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:54:22 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta32) "habanero" b0d40183ac79 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156087 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I also doubt 2 is true, unless XEmacs's object layout has been changed > to move the markbit out of their objects. It hasn't. OTOH, object layout has been tweaked a bit, and our GC has radically changed, though not by moving the markbits. Object layout changes were also part of the rationale for eliminating purespace ISTR. Since you guys did a pretty radical change without eliminating purespace, I don't see a real benefit getting rid of it now. Steve