From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:51:58 -0600 Message-ID: <87mwj912a9.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> References: <1388785952.11337.16.camel@Iris> <3166302.gI3LmCZv1L@descartes> <1388853707.11337.27.camel@Iris> <87zjnby4nu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <1388862282.11337.31.camel@Iris> <87bnzr8s03.fsf@wanadoo.es> <831u0mv1mw.fsf@gnu.org> <87txdi74mc.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83ppo6tkjx.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnzqge8g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871u0m2bqa.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> <87ha9hzw2d.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389027144 17932 80.91.229.3 (6 Jan 2014 16:52:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jay Belanger Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 06 17:52:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0DPa-0003fS-1y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:52:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36175 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0DPZ-0005Mq-MB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:52:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0DPP-0005MK-3p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:52:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0DPG-0008BP-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:52:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]:45885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0DPG-0008BB-Cq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id uy17so7700696igb.4 for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:52:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mu9X7WNCRANufU8Pri0QVZ9JHl3AVF3knVSsMBPSkwU=; b=Ca3QbeSN1BasikvqcqAp8M7YWwfQSgGKgqw0aZkxAt/v6T7WDq12SfKAXcelRkLwEo eqJLKOHEk+psTxNHIOPQhgRrbA0HbCeJA/rJfY4vJEhyiybeTR6kf00YFDor9jaQxFGs k9ieL/uW1T+3fxN5G9AD6icj+j9rpN8376pXGR3GcJveXqk6uhzvdckUMZbbU0Z6vixi 4PU1aRpxnUhJZUYQIvapfe/c0kttJrWdY1iAn0FJ9q54liYkHfNalG7ueMz8pcknldX7 dahMQWHjytX40xF10MZBwAZVb/7D5Dy+TzJFRGu4Kf+FnyydTqpGl1+fcqmXe6I30rh8 +gGg== X-Received: by 10.50.21.2 with SMTP id r2mr20935650ige.13.1389027121344; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:52:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from floss.red-bean.com (74-92-190-113-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [74.92.190.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w4sm15795642igb.5.2014.01.06.08.51.58 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:51:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ha9hzw2d.fsf@gmail.com> (Jay Belanger's message of "Sun, 05 Jan 2014 20:24:42 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167480 Archived-At: Jay Belanger writes: >That would just tell you who was the loudest, not which choice was >preferred by most people. I suspect it wouldn't matter, but if numbers >are wanted, I think some sort of formal vote should be taken. My intention with my "PROPOSAL:" mail was to gather those numbers; I think those people followed up with a "+1" (or the opposite) grokked that intention. So the numbers in that thread be gathered accurately without regard to who's loudest -- we don't count someone twice just because they posted twice. Now, it may not have been clear that the thread was meant to take this count, and we could have a separate "VOTE:" thread if we really want to, but my strong impression from the existing thread is that we already know how that vote would turn out. >Of course, maybe numbers aren't necessary; Stefan may just want to hear >the discussion and decide what to do. Or maybe he already has. I thought he has, and has stated so. =C2=ADK