From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17625: 24.4.50; All installed packages marked "unsigned", no archive listed Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:01 -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87mwczagnm.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87tx89ffax.fsf@pellet.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <2vvbsnrgpk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403792967 3609 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2014 14:29:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daiki Ueno , 17625@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 26 16:29:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Afu-0000OT-6H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:29:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44958 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Aft-0005zU-Ic for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Afk-0005yS-WD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Aff-00015Y-4Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Aff-00015U-0w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Afe-0004Uh-HV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17625 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17625-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17625.140379293617261 (code B ref 17625); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17625) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2014 14:28:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0AfT-0004U6-DX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:28:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com ([209.85.192.49]:62809) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0AfN-0004Th-De for 17625@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id f51so3065567qge.8 for <17625@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:28:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=6GjTEUyI4kB7TyxUVqUGMaAIC2aGAb427U7gyTMVLWA=; b=k5K3cT50I5sB6eM0hISwHG6BnUlNYmzZR89dFmMY4rOvbBh8xlOk/AkGjXdsqrYW+b ECgNjb820CmHie5kRhIE8FT7pW7B5QzPkG6v8y8/alOOzxHN1hdiOfUIXcmzcmJzDPl6 lZokjCfbbLkcdVsBU8jgxOCgzNeyoLC93Ijqc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=6GjTEUyI4kB7TyxUVqUGMaAIC2aGAb427U7gyTMVLWA=; b=O4rxyhRi3Im81XFS/JYFZIN25v8GFpIXW3BFzH6S3+rP169vBrxBAGMQ9+xKWvJWCO olj7iHpNRpmfDNOrggufIxSLvRQYzhwHzQabATG8sti0oa6iH1eVxB64CrQ6cEtnVtnT n8ZSQD+h+iFmvZQok0udHiDrbvFZXoopdfcirlOq7RdYYkKAYhPxlD7+GP9f8TlCiTO5 Y9FH3wfod0+hL+cDXGCM8yMzsgspJ85zPmL7SDKuitx7517qgZMvSpSGe1JJ5pvkG9Rs MsDemSizj2NW/SkoLCoggfFJUdX1Q4TH5+cr0lIelSRF5wwUAVM/KS5qVlmkWb52HbDi lNdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmvlUar2RXowan2gJsRNC+NSx/bTu4ondJfcBj7JEGLEtrbXQoxM/fw1hZtVk0mGbw04zaW X-Received: by 10.140.29.9 with SMTP id a9mr7960214qga.103.1403792919934; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from flea (c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.229.61.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h65sm4324670qgf.35.2014.06.26.07.28.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:28:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:35:34 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90839 Archived-At: On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:35:34 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> 1- why have `package-desc-signed' (and the foo.signed files)? I don't >>> think APT has such a feature and I'm wondering what would be >>> the interest. >> I remember it was exactly for displaying signed/unsigned status on the >> list, requested by Ted: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-10/msg00033.html >> I'm not sure if it is useful at this point. SM> Ted, do you remember why you wanted the "unsigned status" displayed in SM> the package list? SM> I can't think of a use-case where it's helpful. I think it's helpful to indicate if packages are signed--unless they must be signed by default, which is currently not the case. Ted