From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:44:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87mw6sr6u1.fsf@engster.org> References: <20141205123549.GA29331@thyrsus.com> <2815659.zRQ0WWWeRr@descartes> <20141205175810.GD3120@thyrsus.com> <87wq66ufyt.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87zjb04tlw.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnnfve9c.fsf@dod.no> <871to5kt1a.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87r3w4rjks.fsf@engster.org> <87a92s1z26.fsf@Gertrud.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418413522 7248 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2014 19:45:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 12 20:45:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzW9M-0007sI-1T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:45:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59266 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzW9L-0007tF-GU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:45:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzW93-0007qd-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzW8w-00073H-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:44:57 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:43788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzW8w-0006xz-ME for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:44:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=Xdv7pgzGaDOQojm3MvzGvAix4x+PrdKuqSxLabKAklA=; b=G9BO2V3rh9VJmvQ16XIfrca85GGkjr19X80vKqk041LzNVBlkQSnnzp5x26WA0IQehUXghXwdnkswHf8oIN+f3kFYWLiL74U8abrkFGZ0wSTzMYKUlU33gquJ5APqh3N; Original-Received: from ip4d154cb9.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.21.76.185] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzW8p-0001hA-Ou; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:44:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a92s1z26.fsf@Gertrud.fritz.box> (Achim Gratz's message of "Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:51:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179957 Archived-At: Achim Gratz writes: > David Engster writes: >> > time emacs --batch -Q orgmanual.org --eval "(with-current-buffer >> \"orgmanual.org\" (org-export-to-file (quote html) >> \"orgmanual.html\"))" >> emacs --batch -Q orgmanual.org --eval 117.49s user 0.12s system >> 100% cpu 1:57.56 total >> >> That's almost TWO MINUTES just for exporting one manual, and not even a >> particularly big one. And that's on a Core i7. > > Told you so. But the discussion at the moment is whether Org would be > a suitable format, not whether the export is slow. No. This is not a theoretical discussion about formats. Whatever format we might switch to must have an implementation that's suitable. -David