* patch to emacs-24 or master? @ 2015-02-04 14:02 Stephen Berman 2015-02-04 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Stephen Berman @ 2015-02-04 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-devel I'd like to apply a patch for bug#19727 to todo-mode.el (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2015-01/msg00963.html), which is at most a minor bug (arguably not really a bug but behavior that at least one user found surprising, and I have no objection to eliminating that surprise). Is emacs-24 the appropriate branch? Steve Berman ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to emacs-24 or master? 2015-02-04 14:02 patch to emacs-24 or master? Stephen Berman @ 2015-02-04 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii 2015-02-04 21:48 ` Stephen Berman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2015-02-04 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Berman; +Cc: emacs-devel > From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> > Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:02:41 +0100 > > I'd like to apply a patch for bug#19727 to todo-mode.el > (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2015-01/msg00963.html), > which is at most a minor bug (arguably not really a bug but behavior > that at least one user found surprising, and I have no objection to > eliminating that surprise). Is emacs-24 the appropriate branch? If it is safe and localized (i.e. cannot possibly cause problems elsewhere), then please commit to emacs-24. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to emacs-24 or master? 2015-02-04 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii @ 2015-02-04 21:48 ` Stephen Berman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Stephen Berman @ 2015-02-04 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:42:32 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote: >> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> >> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:02:41 +0100 >> >> I'd like to apply a patch for bug#19727 to todo-mode.el >> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2015-01/msg00963.html), >> which is at most a minor bug (arguably not really a bug but behavior >> that at least one user found surprising, and I have no objection to >> eliminating that surprise). Is emacs-24 the appropriate branch? > > If it is safe and localized (i.e. cannot possibly cause problems > elsewhere), then please commit to emacs-24. Thanks. It's safe, so I pushed it to emacs-24. Steve Berman ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-04 21:48 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-02-04 14:02 patch to emacs-24 or master? Stephen Berman 2015-02-04 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii 2015-02-04 21:48 ` Stephen Berman
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.